Random Shite
@joecienkowski demonstrates he’s a gutton for punishment.
Ok Peachy, remember, prove the flud™ using ONLY science. You can do it this time, I have faith in you. Hmm bad choice of word.
Unde rthe delusion that he won the first debate, and under the impression he could possibly convert someone to theism, @joecienkowski has a second debate.
This time however, he’s going to use ONLY science to prove the flood.
What could go wrong?
The biggest fucktard on Twitter, Joe ‘Peachy’ Cienkowski, in a debate. Let the hilarity commence.
Obama said "future must not hold for those who slander Muhammad", so why would he attend the supporters of those… http://t.co/LmOjALi5Dw
— Joe Cienkowski (@JoeCienkowski) January 12, 2015
Wow! That’s a hell of a quote, what do you think the odds are that that’s been taken completely out of context? I know, ninth commandment and all that.
So what did Obama ACTUALLY say in that speech?
The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam. But to be credible, those who condemn that slander must also condemn the hate we see in the images of Jesus Christ that are desecrated, or churches that are destroyed, or the Holocaust that is denied.
Gee, who saw that coming?
Blame it on a bizarre alignment of the planets, or Nibiru, or just plain boredom, but on December 30th 2014 Fundamentally Flawed reunited for a one-off* podcast special.
With Alex, Kat, my good self, Peter and later on a pissed up Jim, we discuss some of the events of 2014 (thanks to Wikipedia’s exhaustive list of events and deaths)
WARNING! This contains video of me and my comedy accent.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-sj1vy2u3XE
* probably not.
Hitler used children, disarmed Germany, then committed atrocities. Obama, a Socialist Marxist, used children, wants to disarm Americans
— Joe Cienkowski (@JoeCienkowski) January 19, 2013
The Weimar Republic had some of the toughest laws against gun control, mostly thanks to the terms of the Versailles treaty.
Enter the Nazi’s, and the 1938 German Weapons Act which relaxed the laws so you could own a gun at 18 instead of 20, permits updated every three years instead of one year and the exemptions from any gun control applied to millions of people. Oh and Jews were forbidden to own guns.
You’re lying fuck Peachy, and a little research shows you’re a little fuck.
Hitler used children, disarmed Germany, then committed atrocities. Obama, a Socialist Marxist, used children, wants to disarm Americans
— Joe Cienkowski (@JoeCienkowski) January 19, 2013
The Weimar Republic had some of the toughest laws against gun control, mostly thanks to the terms of the Versailles treaty.
Enter the Nazi’s, and the 1938‚ German Weapons Act which relaxed the laws so you could own a gun at 18 instead of 20, permits updated every three years instead of one year and the exemptions from any gun control applied to millions of people. Oh and Jews were forbidden to own guns.
You lying fundamentalist fucker Joe.
No Peachy, you don’t understand it. Despite the many years of people patiently trying to explain it to you, you STILL haven’t got a fucking clue. There is no excuse for your level of stupidity. I know you don’t like being called stupid, but I use that word not as an insult but because, unlike you, I can backup my statements with facts. And I’ll do it using your own words.
Grand Reality, page 1
“common ancestry, and abiogenesis are all part of the theory of evolution” No they’re not.
Page 5,
“But, instead of giving God the glory, it is given to ‘time and chance’ or nature.” Time and chance are nothing to do with evolution. Show where it says that.
Page 6,
“this will also prove clearly, convincingly and compellingly that humans and apes have no common ancestors” Nope. Read up on DNA some time.
Page 7,
“Since you believe something we never see, evolution, you must also believe in abiogenesis, something we never see” Nope, http://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?q=observations+of+evolution&hl=en&as_sdt=0&as_vis=1&oi=scholart and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence_of_common_descent and http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-speciation.html and http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/speciation.html just for starters.
Page 7-8
“Do you know the unbelievable changes that would’ve had to have happened without guidance? The would’ve had to have evolved, as well as the heart, lungs, blood, bones, male and female distinctions, systems of the body, simultaneously.” Just… wow!
Page 8,
“Atheists like to say …abiogenesis and evolution are two different things. You can’t compare them”. I don’t believe this is the case since;” What you believe is irrelevant. Abiogenesis is how life started, evolutionary biology is how life evolved.
And now I’ve lost the will to live reading your book, but it’s just simple examples of why you don’t know what evolution is at the most basic level, and even worse, you have no idea what the scientific method is that has shown evolution to be a fact.
So again, I call you stupid not because I want to insult you, but because it’s a fact, as much as evolution is a fact.
